Legal Opinion
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Blue & White Service Corp.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided November 19, 1987No. Civ. 4-86-345PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DONALD J. PORTER, Chief Judge, Sitting by Designation.
The plaintiff in this action, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) is a federal agency authorized to enforce Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended. 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (1982). The defendant, Blue and White Service Corporation (“Blue and White”) is a Minnesota corporation doing business in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Blue and White had and continues to have at least fifteen employees and is an employer engaged in a business affecting commerce within the meaning of section 701(b), (g) and (h)…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Newman v. Piggie Park Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Ford Motor Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- National Labor Relations Board v. Gullett Gin Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Dillon v. ColesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wheeler v. Catholic ArchdioceseCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
- Wheeler v. Catholic Archdiocese of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Mason v. Association for Independent GrowthDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
- Montgomery v. FrankDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1992
- Wheeler v. Catholic Archdiocese of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1994