Cunningham v. Wood
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.
We think that the proper interpretation of the complaint filed by appellant, which was stricken on motion, is that it is an original bill in the nature of a bill of review, seeking to vacate a decree in equity against her because she was and is a non compos mentis. The bill does not allege, neither does the record of the original suit show, that in that suit, though made a party to it, the fact of her being a non compos mentis was made known to the court. On the contrary, she defended by counsel, without a guardian ad litem or general guardian. The bill does not seek to review that proceeding…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- McDonald v. PearsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1896
- Edmondson v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
- White v. FarleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
- Graves v. BrittinghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
- Nichols v. DillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Olivera v. GraceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Wilkerson v. WilkersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
- Duncan v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
- Farrell v. FarrellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
- Large v. Hayes by and Through NesbittSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.