Hirshhorn v. Mine Safety Appliances Co.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
STEWART, District Judge.
Plaintiff, a stockholder in Carbon Monoxide Eliminator Corporation, brought this action on his own behalf and on behalf of other stockholders of Carbon Monoxide Eliminator Corporation to -require an- accounting of profits allegedly diverted from Carbon Monoxide Eliminator Corporation and Catalyst Research Corporation to the Mine Safety Appliances Company. The individual defendants are various participants in this alleged diversion of profits. By reason of the ownership by Carbon Monoxide Eliminator Corporation of stock in Catalyst Research Company, this action…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Pepper v. LittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Southern Pacific Co. v. BogertSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Geddes v. Anaconda Copper Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Standard Parts Co. v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Mansfield Hardwood Lumber Company v. Hattie A. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
- Hartley Pen Co. v. Lindy Pen Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1954
- Bellis v. ThalDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
- In Re REA Express, Inc., Private Treble Damage, Etc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
- Aetna-Standard Engineering Co. v. RowlandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.