Worms v. Lake
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
This is a demurrer to the second amended complaint in which plaintiffs allege in part that the defendant misappropriated the whole fund contributed by all the parties of the second part to the agreement, and that by reason of the acts of the defendant the oil and gas lease is now terminated and the purpose of the enterprise abandoned. The plaintiffs bring this action at law against the defendant, one of their coadventurers, to recover the sum of $2,500, their contribution to the joint enterprise, which sum is alleged to have been misappropriated by the defendant. The other coadventurers are…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Dalury v. RezinasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
- Dalury v. . RezinasNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Howard v. . FranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Belanger v. DanaNew York Supreme Court · 1889
- Hollister v. SimonsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Vail v. Pacific Fish Products Co.California Court of Appeal · 1925