Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Pleau

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided May 21, 2012No. 11-1775, 11-1782Published

1Concurrence

TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge, with whom THOMPSON, Circuit Judge,

joins, dissenting.

I respectfully dissent from the denial of the motion to stay the issuance of the mandate in this case. Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 41(d)(2)(A) permits this Court to stay a mandate pending the filing of a petition for certiorari if the petition would “present a substantial question” and if there is “good cause for a stay.” The inquiry contemplated by this rule “focuses on whether the applicant has a reasonable probability of succeeding on the merits and whether the applicant will suffer irreparable injury.”…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. MauroSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. United States v. Joel Robert ScheerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  3. United States v. William BryantCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
  4. United States v. Frederick D. Graham, A/K/A Wayne I. Boykin, Bertil Hanson, Walter F. Smith, Milton PierceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  5. Robert McBride v. CSX Transportation, IncorporatCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API