Legal Opinion

United States v. Frederick D. Graham, A/K/A Wayne I. Boykin, Bertil Hanson, Walter F. Smith, Milton Pierce

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 6, 1980No. 80-1145PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ADAMS, Circuit Judge.

The question presented on this appeal is whether Article IV(a) of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act, 1 which provides the governor of a state thirty days in which to disapprove a request for temporary custody of a prisoner confined in that state, applies to a request for custody made by a federal court pursuant to a writ of habeas corpus ad prosequendum. We hold that Congress did not intend Article IV(a) to apply under these circumstances, and accordingly affirm.

I

In early June 1979, 2 the United States Marshal for the District Court of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. MauroSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Ex Parte Bollman and SwartwoutSupreme Court of the United States · 1807
  3. Carbo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Montalet v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1807
  5. United States v. William BryantCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. Joel Robert ScheerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  2. United States v. PleauCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
  3. United States v. PleauCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
  4. United States v. Joel Robert ScheerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  5. United States v. PleauCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API