Legal Opinion

Wells v. Noey

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1965No. 510PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NESBETT, Chief Justice.

In a previous action between the parties hereto Noey sued the Wellses to quiet title to certain real property located in Anchorage, Alaska, based on a claim of adverse possession. The Wellses denied that Noey had occupied the property adversely for the seven year period required by statute 1 and in a counterclaim alleged that Noey’s only claim to ownership was based on an erroneous, illegal and void tax deed to the property. Although the decision was in favor of Noey on his claim of adverse possession the trial court found that the Wellses had failed to prove the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rhodes v. RhodesAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Miller v. JohnsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Mitchell v. LandAlaska Supreme Court · 1960
  4. MacDonald v. KrauseNevada Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Wilson v. Interior Airways, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ellingstad v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Ellingstad v. STATE, DEPT. OF NAT. RES.Alaska Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Domke v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co., Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Andrews v. Wade & De Young, Inc., P.C.Alaska Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Joseph v. DarrarIdaho Supreme Court · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API