Tom-Pah-Pe v. Roddy
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
MASON, Y. C. J.
The defendant in error, Ida Roddy, as plaintiff, commenced this action to recover $l,51i5.40, with interest and attorney’s fee, om a note executed on the 28th day of July, 1924, by the plaintiff in error, Rose Pratt, and to foreclose a real estate mortgage given to secure the same.
The plaintiff alleged that said note was executed and delivered to one Bright Rod-dy and that thereafter, and before maturity, the plaintiff purchased said note from him on the 1st day of August, 1924, for a valuable consideration, in due course and in good faith. Defendant’s demurrer to plaintiff’s…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Goshen National Bank v. BinghamNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Mayers v. McRimmon.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Ireland v. ScharpenbergWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Carter v. ButlerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1915
- First National Bank v. McCulloughOregon Supreme Court · 1908
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- May v. City Nat. Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- Conrad v. JamesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Bennett v. StewartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928