Legal Opinion
Harrison v. Hickel
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 23, 1993No. 92-35477PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALARCON, Circuit Judge:
Alaska Natives David P. Harrison and other owners of Native Allotment No. 053702 (“Harrisons”) appeal from the judgment dismissing their action against the State of Alaska, its Governor, certain state officers, and various business organizations. The district court dismissed the action against the State of Alaska with prejudice pursuant to the Eleventh Amendment. The action against the individual defendants was dismissed without prejudice.
The Harrisons contend that the district court had jurisdiction to adjudicate their claims because federal courts have jurisdiction…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Davis v. PassmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Hans v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Atascadero State Hospital v. ScanlonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Webster v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- William Hibbs, United States of America, Intervenor v. Department of Human Resources Charlotte Crawford Nikki FirpoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Felder v. USTACourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2022
- J.C. Eaglesmith v. Jack Ward, Mendocino County Superintendent of SchoolsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Sofamor Danek Group, Inc. v. Mark Brown, in His Official Capacity as Director of the State of Washington Department of Labor and IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 298, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 407 State of Montana v. Toni A. Gilham, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Christine Marie GilhamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.