Kinard v. Kaelin
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLennon, P. J.
In this action the plaintiffs sought to set aside a sale of certain real property alleged to have been made by John C. Scott and Agnes Kaelin, trustees designated in a deed of trust, conveying the property in question, and executed by plaintiffs for the benefit of the defendant Joseph R. Kaelin, and as security for the payment of a promissory note executed to him by the plaintiffs in the sum of seven thousand dollars.
Plaintiffs’ complaint alleged that contemporaneously with the execution of the promissory note and deed of trust the plaintiffs and the defendant, Joseph B. Kaelin, entered into…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Sacramento Bank v. AlcornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Heddles v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
- Winterburn v. ChambersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- People v. HagarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877
- Horton v. DominguezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bank of Italy National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. BentleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Wood v. HenleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Stephens, Partain & Cunningham v. HollisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Bayer v. HoaglandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Mahoney v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1929
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.