Legal Opinion

Stephens, Partain & Cunningham v. Hollis

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 4, 1987No. C000364PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SIMS, J.

—Defendants appeal from a judgment in an unlawful detainer action contending the trial court erroneously concluded plaintiff showed sufficient lawful title to the subject real property. Defendants assert, among other things, that plaintiff’s title is defective because it obtained title from a trustee of a deed of trust who had purchased the property at the trustee’s, own foreclosure sale. We conclude the trustee’s purchase was lawful and defendants’ other contentions are without merit. We shall therefore affirm the judgment.

Facts

In October 1979, defendants Albert and Mary Lee…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Wyatt v. Union Mortgage Co.California Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Vella v. HudginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Arnolds Management Corp. v. EischenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. Batson v. StrehlowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Hocking v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1951

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Vien-Phuong Thi Ho v. ReconTrust Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  2. Pantoja v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2009
  3. Monterey S.P. Partnership v. W. L. Bangham, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Wansley v. First Nat. Bank of VicksburgMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Hatch v. CollinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API