Legal Opinion

Dyer v. Best Pharmacal

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 2, 1978No. 1 CA-CIV 3510PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EUBANK, Presiding Judge.

Roosevelt and Betty Dyer brought an action against Best Pharmacal and D-M Pharmaceutical to recover for injuries sustained when Betty Dyer received an injection of NOL-L.A., a drug manufactured by D-M and distributed by Best. The Dyers appeal from the summary judgment entered in favor of Best and D-M. Since the record supports the trial court’s determination that no action by Best or D-M proximately caused Mrs. Dyer’s injuries, we affirm the summary judgment.

In March of 1974, Betty Dyer consulted Dr. Augustus Stewart, D. 0., to obtain assistance in weight…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Toole v. Richardson-Merrell Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1967
  2. Carmichael v. ReitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  3. OS Stapley Company v. MillerArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Leibowitz v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Mulder v. Parke Davis & CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Gaston v. HunterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  2. Vitanza v. Upjohn Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  3. Hill v. Squibb & Sons, ERMontana Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Alaface v. National Investment Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  5. Amanda Watts v. Medicis Pharmaceutical CorporationArizona Supreme Court · 2016

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API