Legal Opinion

Karen Kovacs v. Stanley Chesley

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 2, 2005No. 04-3019PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROGERS, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff Karen Kovacs appeals the district court’s order dismissing this case for lack of federal diversity jurisdiction for failure to meet the $75,000 amount in controversy requirement of 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). Because Kovacs has established that the amount in controversy in this case is over $75,000, the judgment of the district court is reversed and the case remanded for further proceedings.

The underlying cause of action in this case is legal malpractice. The action was filed on January 8, 2003, following the dismissal on ripeness grounds of an earlier action.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Vahila v. HallOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Irwin Klepper v. First American BankCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  4. Willie Worthams v. Atlanta Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
  5. Paul A. Wood v. Stark Tri-County Building Trades CouncilCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Schubert v. Auto Owners InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  2. Schultz v. General R v. CenterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  3. Elkins v. American International Special Lines InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2009
  4. Olden v. LaFarge Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2007
  5. Cranpark, Inc. v. Rogers Group, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2010

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API