Legal Opinion

Schultz v. General R v. Center

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 11, 2008No. 06-2322PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McKEAGUE, Circuit Judge.

Walter and Julie Schultz (“Plaintiffs”) filed suit against General R.V. Center and Damon Corp. (“Defendants”) in federal district court, alleging that their new R.V. is defective in violation of federal and state consumer laws. The district court granted summary judgment for Defendants on all counts, and Plaintiffs appealed. Following the conclusion of briefing, Defendants filed before this court a motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction on the basis that the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act’s amount in controversy requirement has not been satisfied.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Carol L. Kirchner GAFFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  4. Terrance Golden v. Gorno Bros., Inc., D/B/A Gorno FordCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  5. Catherine Gardynski-Leschuck v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Grange Mutual Casualty Co. v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2008
  2. Wright v. Linebarger Googan Blair & Sampson, LLPDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2011
  3. Mich. Dep't of Envtl. Quality v. City of FlintDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2017
  4. Leys v. Lowe's Home Centers, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2009
  5. Dan Bennett v. CMH Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API