Legal Opinion

United States v. Nutter

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided June 10, 1986No. CM 444133PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

WOLD, Senior Judge: *

I

Appellant was charged with forcible sodomy and assault with a means likely to produce grievous bodily harm (Articles 125 and 128, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 925, 928 (1982)). The aggravated assault specification alleged that appellant assaulted the victim “by striking him about the head, face, and body with means and force likely to produce grievous bodily harm, to wit: closed fists.” The sodomy specification alleged only that appellant committed sodomy with the victim “by force and without [his] consent.” Thus the forcible sodomy…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Dutton v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Donnelly v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. United States v. Gilberto Pablo AlvarezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  5. United States v. SanchezUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1960

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. BentonArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2001
  2. United States v. EvansU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1990
  3. United States v. PilkingtonNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1998
  4. Brogden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  5. Brogden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API