Legal Opinion · Dissent

Brogden v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 18, 2005No. 55, September Term, 2004Published

1Dissent

*653RAKER, J.,

dissenting, with whom HARRELL, J., joins:

I would affirm the judgment of the Circuit Court for Baltimore City on the grounds of harmless error. Although the court formulated an incorrect response to the jury note as to whether the State has the burden of proving that the defendant did not have a gun license in Maryland, the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.

I

The jury obviously had determined that the defendant was in actual possession of the handgun and was thus wearing, carrying or transporting the gun. Since he raised no defense that he was licensed or permitted to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. OsbandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Commonwealth v. CurtisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  3. Clarence L. Wright v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
  4. United States v. James F. Bolden, United States of America v. George E. JonesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
  5. Commonwealth v. TorresMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API