Legal Opinion

Fletcher v. Pierceall

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 17, 1956No. Civ. 16946PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.

Plaintiff brought this action against defendant Piereeall to recover damages for personal injuries sustained when the car in which plaintiff was riding as a guest was hit from the rear by a car driven by Pierceall. The jury brought in a verdict in favor of defendant. From the judgment based on that verdict plaintiff appeals.

The accident happened on August 27,1953, between 4 and 5 p. m. in the vicinity of where the 98th Avenue overpass crosses over the Eastshore Freeway in Oakland. The freeway runs east and west, has two traffic lanes in each direction, and down the middle of the freeway is a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gray v. BrinkerhoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Lowenthal v. MortimerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Kauffman v. De MutiisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Schellhous v. BallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  5. Lund v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1944

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of LiuCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  2. Pandell v. HischierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. Britton v. GundersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. Demangos v. CannonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. Bostard v. BostardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API