Legal Opinion

Bostard v. Bostard

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 13, 1968No. Civ. 31639PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.

Plaintiff appeals from interlocutory decree of divorce and seeks review of order denying her motion for a new trial. (Diemer v. Eric F. Anderson, Inc., 242 Cal.App.2d 503, 508 [51 Cal.Rptr. 657].)

The parties were married August 5, 1958, and separated May 18,1964; they have two minor children. Plaintiff has a 16-year-old son by a former marriage and receives from his father $75 per month child support. She is 37 years old, physically able to work, in the past has been employed, is experienced as a file clerk and in general office work and presently has on file written applications for…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of CoverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Boynton v. McKalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. People v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Fomco, Inc. v. Joe Maggio, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Slemons v. PatersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Horowitz v. NobleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  2. In Re Marriage of LiuCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  3. Schultz v. MathiasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Horowitz v. NobleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. In Re Marriage of LiuCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API