Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Bruggeman v. Meditrust Co., LLC

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 17, 2004No. COA03-944Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partTyson, Judge

I concur in the majority opinion’s conclusion that the trial court’s order must be vacated and remanded. I agree the trial court did not have jurisdiction to enter the order allowing Newton and McGonigal to intervene while an appeal was pending before this Court. I vote to vacate on these grounds. I dissent from the majority opinion’s dicta on procedures on remand. A superior court judge does not possess jurisdiction to enter an order overruling an earlier order by another superior court judge on the same issue without a finding of substantial change in circumstances.

I. Background

Plaintiffs…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Calloway v. Ford Motor CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  4. State v. WoolridgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2003
  5. Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API