United States v. Howitt
District Court, S.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLAND, District Judge.
Defendants have demurred to the indictment returned against them, which demurrer was argued before the Court on Saturday, May 13, 1944, and taken under advisement.
The contention of the defendants is that the Act is aimed at railroads as principals, with the agents, servants, officers, etc., (if a crime is committed by the principal) acting as aiders and abettors, and unless the railroad gets the benefit of the over-charge, the ticket agent cannot be prosecuted because then he, the agent, is a trespasser, an embezzler, or violator of some other State law. Stated…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Toledo, A. A. & N. M. Ry. Co. v. Pennsylvania Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio · 1893
- Rooney v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1913
- Collins v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
- In re PeasleyU.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois · 1890
- United States v. EstesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- James P. Edwards, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961