Legal Opinion

United States v. Estes

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided April 4, 1924No. Nos. 12324, 12330PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FITZHENRY, District Judge.

Defendants demur to the indictments herein, for the reason that they are vague, indefinite, uncertain, and duplicitous, as well as assigning several special causes for demurrer.

As to the first i. e., said indictment does not allege that the defendants were employed by said railroad corporations, or either of them, etc. The indictment shows with sufficient clarity that three certain railroads were corporations and common carriers, engaged in the business of transporting property and persons from Chicago, Ill., to Atlanta, Ga.; that the Pullman Company was a sleeping…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Howitt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Howitt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1945
  3. United States v. HowittDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API