Davis v. Graviss
Kentucky Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
LEIBSON, Justice.
The issue is whether the Court of Appeals erred in setting aside the verdict in this case as excessive. From our review of the record we conclude that the evidence was sufficient to support the jury’s verdict and that the Court of Appeals’ standard for review was inappropriate. We reverse the Court of Appeals and affirm the verdict and judgment of the trial court.
It is difficult to summarize the evidence because there are two versions, both documented by the record depending upon how one views it. One view was expressed in the appellant’s brief and accepted by the jury and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Deutsch v. SheinKentucky Supreme Court · 1980
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co. v. MattinglyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1960
- Schwegel v. GoldbergSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Rogers v. KasdanKentucky Supreme Court · 1981
- Joel W. Martin v. City of New Orleans and David MichellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by79 opinions
- Ayers v. Township of JacksonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
- Meyers v. Chapman Printing Co., Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1992
- Shuamber v. HendersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
- United Parcel Service Co. v. RickertKentucky Supreme Court · 1999
- Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. GolightlyKentucky Supreme Court · 1998
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.