Legal Opinion
United States v. Pierce S. Han
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided October 31, 2000No. 1999PublishedCited by 69 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DORSEY, District Judge:
Appellant Pierce S. Han appeals his conviction of knowingly and willfully traveling in interstate commerce for the purposes of engaging in a sexual act with a person under 18 years of age, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2423(b). He claims this statute was enforced unconstitutionally as his only interstate conduct was his crossing state lines with illegal intent. He also argues error in that the district court: 1) prohibited testimony as to his reputation as a law abiding citizen who does not exploit others; 2) refused to allow him to call a witness to testify as to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- United States v. Al TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Roxanne Lumpkin, Mario WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- United States v. John Pascarella, Mark D'andrea, John BreheneyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- Provost v. City of NewburghCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Martha Stewart and Peter BacanovicCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- United States v. BrandCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Todd Tykarsky A/K/A Toddyty63 A/K/A Golpher12345Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- United States v. CoppolaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.