Legal Opinion

McCullough v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 26, 2017No. CR-05-1183PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShawn A. Womack, Associate Justice

| petitioner Walter A. McCullough was convicted of committing a terrorist act and first degree battery in 2005 and brings his second pro se petition to reinvest jurisdiction in the trial court to consider a petition for writ of error coram nobis. We deny his petition because it is without merit.

McCullough alleges again that the State, and his trial counsel, violated Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963), by threatening and intimidating material witnesses from testifying at trial, not revealing to the defense every person who was interviewed by the State, and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Howard v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
  5. Roberts v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Martinez-Marmol v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2018
  2. Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2018
  3. Danny Ray Henington v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2020
  4. Rayford v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2018
  5. Rodney Lee Mitchael v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2020

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API