Legal Opinion

Jackson v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 21, 2018No. CR-10-43PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHAWN A. WOMACK, Associate Justice *358Pending before this court is petitioner Michael Dashun Jackson's pro se petition to reinvest jurisdiction in the trial court to consider a petition for writ of error coram nobis. Jackson's claims for coram nobis relief are based on allegations that the prosecutor withheld material evidence in violation of Brady v. Maryland , 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963). Jackson was convicted of capital murder, criminal attempt to commit capital murder, and aggravated robbery with a firearm enhancement, and sentenced to life in prison without parole. We…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Howard v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
  4. Roberts v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
  5. Westerman v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Osburn v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2018
  2. Alexander v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2019
  3. Rainer v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2019
  4. Terry Swanigan v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2019
  5. Fields v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2019

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API