Legal Opinion
D.D.G. General Contracting Corp. v. Hartnett
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 20, 1989PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— Mikoll, J.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (initiated in this court pursuant to Labor Law §§ 220 and 220-b) to review a determination of respondent which, inter alia, found that petitioner had underpaid its employees.
Petitioner entered into a public works contract in October 1984 with the Department of Transportation (hereinafter DOT) to paint various highway bridges in Oneida and Montgomery Counties. The contract required petitioner to pay its employees the prevailing wages and supplemental benefits for their respective trades in each county, as set forth in the applicable wage-rate…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- In re Cam-Ful Industries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Dadson Plumbing Corp. v. GoldinNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Gross Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Department of LaborAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- John Schepanski Roofing & Gutters v. RobertsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
3Cited by10 opinions
- Otis Eastern Service, Inc. v. HudacsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Sarco Industries v. AngelloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- L & M Co. v. New York State Department of LaborAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Consolidated Masonry Contractors, Inc. v. AngelloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Georgakis Painters Corp. v. HartnettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.