Legal Opinion
In re Cam-Ful Industries, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 26, 1987PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCasey, J.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (initiated in this court pursuant to Labor Law §§ 220, 220-b) to review a determination of respondent which, inter alia, found that petitioner had willfully underpaid employees.
Petitioner was engaged as a subcontractor to perform certain piping work on a public work project subject to the prevailing wage and supplement requirements of Labor Law § 220. A Department of Labor investigator discovered that two of petitioner’s employees who operated equipment for a substantial portion of the work week were being paid as laborers rather than as equipment…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Levin v. GallmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- In Re the Claim of ValvoNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- In re the Claim of ValvoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- C.E.L. Lumber, Inc. v. RobertsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
3Cited by24 opinions
- Mid Hudson Pam Corp. v. HartnettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- E. Williamson Roofing & Sheet Metal Co. v. Town of ParishAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Hull-Hazard, Inc. v. RobertsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Nash v. New York State Department of LaborAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Sarco Industries v. AngelloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.