Legal Opinion

Harlan v. Vetter

Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)

Decided May 28, 1987No. 11-86-217-CVPublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ARNOT, Justice.

This is an appeal from a declaratory judgment action wherein the trial court found that a document entitled “Affidavit” was insufficient as a conveyance of the minerals. We affirm.

Appellant, Norma Jean Harlan, contends that her husband, Eugene H. Harlan, conveyed certain mineral interests in Texas to her in an instrument which created a joint tenancy with right of survivorship. The only appellees who filed a brief are the children of Eugene H. Harlan.

The instrument, in its entirety, reads as follows:

STATE OF TENNESSEE

COUNTY OF DeKALB

AFFIDAVIT

PERSONALLY APPEARED, before…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Maupin v. ChaneyTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Broaddus v. GroutTexas Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Alford v. KrumTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Langehennig v. HohmannTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Pierson v. Sanger Bros.Texas Supreme Court · 1899

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Cherokee Water Co. v. Freeman, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2000
  2. Reiland v. Patrick Thomas Properties, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2006
  3. Ostrowski v. Ivanhoe Property Owners Improvement Ass'n, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2001
  4. Gore Oil Co. v. Roosth, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2005
  5. MASGAS v. Anderson, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2010

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API