Harlan v. Vetter
Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ARNOT, Justice.
This is an appeal from a declaratory judgment action wherein the trial court found that a document entitled “Affidavit” was insufficient as a conveyance of the minerals. We affirm.
Appellant, Norma Jean Harlan, contends that her husband, Eugene H. Harlan, conveyed certain mineral interests in Texas to her in an instrument which created a joint tenancy with right of survivorship. The only appellees who filed a brief are the children of Eugene H. Harlan.
The instrument, in its entirety, reads as follows:
STATE OF TENNESSEE
COUNTY OF DeKALB
AFFIDAVIT
PERSONALLY APPEARED, before…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Maupin v. ChaneyTexas Supreme Court · 1942
- Broaddus v. GroutTexas Supreme Court · 1953
- Alford v. KrumTexas Supreme Court · 1984
- Langehennig v. HohmannTexas Supreme Court · 1942
- Pierson v. Sanger Bros.Texas Supreme Court · 1899
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Cherokee Water Co. v. Freeman, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2000
- Reiland v. Patrick Thomas Properties, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2006
- Ostrowski v. Ivanhoe Property Owners Improvement Ass'n, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2001
- Gore Oil Co. v. Roosth, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2005
- MASGAS v. Anderson, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2010
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.