Legal Opinion
MASGAS v. Anderson
Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)
Decided May 6, 2010No. 11-08-00180-CVPublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JIM R. WRIGHT, Chief Justice.
This case involves the ownership of working interests in certain oil and gas properties. There are three parties involved in a dispute over the ownership of oil and gas leases: Masgas, a partnership; MHW, Inc.; and E.D. Anderson and his sons. Masgas filed suit against the Andersons seeking recovery of distributions, an accounting, and a declaratory judgment that Masgas owns the disputed working interests. MHW filed a plea in intervention for declaratory relief that MHW owned the disputed working interests. Masgas sought a declaratory judgment against MHW…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co. v. MayesTexas Supreme Court · 2007
- Tenneco Inc. v. Enterprise Products Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1996
- Forbau Ex Rel. Miller v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Freezia v. IS Storage Venture, LLCCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
- XTO Energy Inc. v. NikolaiCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2011
- Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Indenture Trustee for New Century Home Loan Trust 2006-2 v. Stockdick Land Company, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2012
- Jackson v. Wildflower Production Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2016
- Hamrick v. Ward, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2012
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.