SightSound. Com Inc. v. N2k, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
BENSON, United States Magistrate Judge.
A Report and Recommendation has been filed in this matter addressed to the construction of claim language in the patents-in-suit. A Markman hearing was held in which a single evidentiary ruling remains to be made. Hence, this order.
Plaintiff sought to introduce at the hearing as Plaintiffs Exhibit J what it termed “counter-designations” from the deposition testimony of the inventor, Arthur Hair (Docket # 93 at 118). The portions of the transcript were offered in response to an argument made by defendants that the inventor, at the time of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Comark Communications, Inc. v. Harris CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Pitney Bowes, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Company, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- Southwestern Bell Telephone v. Missouri Public Service CommissionDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2006
- Sightsound. Com Inc. v. N2K, INC.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
- Sea Swivel Inc. v. Shuttleslide LLC and Russel TaylorDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2026