Legal Opinion

Keon v. Saxton & Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 15, 1929PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order modified by denying the motion to strike out the first unnumbered defense (paragraphs 1 to 7, inclusive) and the second unnumbered defense" (paragraphs 8 and 9), and as so modified affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to appellant. *734(1) The first unnumbered defense sufficiently pleads ultimate facts with respect to claimed want of jurisdiction over defendant in the court rendering the judgment set out in the complaint-, which defense is available to defendant. (Scanlon v. Kuehn, 225 App. Div. 256.) (2) The same is true with respect to the second unnumbered defense, which…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Spencer v. Standard Chemicals & Metals Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1924
  2. Merry Realty Co. v. Shamokin & Hollis Real Estate Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
  3. Scanlon v. KuehnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
  4. Wenk v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Frisch v. Zelart Drug Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1943
  2. Industrial Capital Co. v. HaimsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
  3. State Ex Rel. Freebourn v. Merchants' Credit Service, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API