Legal Opinion

Frisch v. Zelart Drug Co.

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided April 21, 1943PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMadigan, J.

Upon the foregoing papers this motion under rule 109 of the Buies of Civil Practice is granted and the first and second defenses, consisting of paragraphs “ Fifth ” and “ Sixth ”, are stricken from the answer. The first defense states a conclusion only and, in any event, relates to matters provable under a. general denial. The second defense also states a conclusion only; the facts indicating that plaintiff is not the real party in interest have not been alleged. A 11 mere general averment that plaintiff is not the real party in interest ” is insufficient. (Cf. Keon v. Saxton & Co., 227 App.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Titus v. WallickSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Hargrave v. Mid-Continent Petroleum CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1941
  4. McNorrill v. GibbsDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1942
  5. Gellens v. 11 West 42nd Street, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Marco v. SachsNew York Supreme Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API