State v. Hauge

3. Whether the circuit court erred in ordering Hauge to pay $31,743.82 in restitution.

4. Whether Hauge's sentence was cruel and unusual.

Analysis and Decision

1. Whether Hauge's Sixth Amendment rights were violated.

[¶10.] Hauge's argument that his Sixth Amendment rights were violated is twofold: (1) he argues the court erred in finding his waiver of his right to counsel was knowing, voluntary, and intelligent; and (2) he claims his court-appointed advisory counsel was ineffective.

[¶11.] In a criminal case, a defendant has a constitutional right to be represented by counsel, but he also has "an *170a…