Legal Opinion

People v. Semikoff

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 14, 1934No. Docket No. 160PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

The defendant was charged with the crime of assault by means of force likely to produce great bodily injury, it being alleged that the assault was committed on one John Nedom by striking him with his fists and kick: ing him with his feet. He was found guilty by a jury and has appealed from the ensuing judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

The record shows that the appellant and Nedom had consumed considerable wine together throughout the day of October 8, 1933, at the home of Nedom on a ranch near Kerman, California. Some time after dark on the evening of that day the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. LorraineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  2. People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  3. People v. MetzlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. CherryNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  2. People v. MoodyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  3. People v. FisherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. People v. LopezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. People v. BlackshearCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API