Thurman Industries, Inc. v. Pay'n Pak Stores, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE DEFENDANT’S SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS
ROTHSTEIN, Chief Judge.
DEFENDANT Pay’N Pak seeks summary judgment on: plaintiff’s preferential pricing claims; refusal to deal claims; the remainder of plaintiff’s Sherman Act claims; and plaintiff’s claims brought under the Robinson-Patman Act and the Washington State Consumer Protection Act. The court has considered the memoranda and affidavits submitted by counsel and finds and rules as follows:
Plaintiff and defendant sell home improvement supplies. In September, 1984, plaintiff filed this lawsuit against defendant, alleging that defendant was…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Monsanto Co. v. Spray-Rite Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pressure Vessels of Puerto Rico, Inc. v. Empire GasSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1994
- American Booksellers Ass'n v. Barnes & Noble, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2001
- Rotec Industries, Inc. v. Mitsubishi Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Rotec Industries, Inc. v. Mitsubishi CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003