Legal Opinion
In Re Rost
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided July 17, 2009No. 101,746PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
This case is an original, contested disciplinary action against Thomas O. Rost, who was admitted to practice law in this state on February 16,1966, but who has registered with the Kansas Supreme Court as being on retired status since October 1, 2005. The formal complaint filed by the office of the Disciplinary Administrator contained two counts, designated as Cases Nos. DA9925 and DA10014. The overarching allegation is that Rost continued to actively practice law while on retired status. See Supreme Court Rule 208(a) and (f)(1) (2008 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 307) (attorney registered as retired not…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Granholm v. HealdSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- In the Interest of B.D.-Y.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2008
- In Re LoberSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
- State Ex Rel. Boynton v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
- State v. SchumacherSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
- In re HolmesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2022