Legal Opinion

State v. Schumacher

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 2, 1974No. 46,581PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a proceeding in contempt in which the respondent, an attorney-at-law, is charged with willful disobedience of an order of this court suspending him from the practice of law. That suspension was for a period of six months from and after November 4, 1972. State v. Schumacher, 210 Kan. 377, 502 P. 2d 748.

After the accusation in this proceeding was filed the court appointed the Honorable Fred N. Six, of Lawrence, as its commissioner to receive evidence and make a report of his recommended findings of fact and conclusions of law. His report was filed on December 3, 1973, together with the…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. In Re Integration of the Nebraska State Bar Ass'nNebraska Supreme Court · 1937
  2. In Re DuncanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1909
  3. Eley v. MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. Martin v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  5. State Ex Rel. Boynton v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1979
  2. In Re Ronald T. Mitchell, Esq. In Re Stafford A. Hilaire, EsqCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  3. In Re the Reinstatement of PETERSONSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  4. Skahan v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1982
  5. State Ex Rel. Stephan v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API