Saltzman v. United States

Plaintiff sues for the salary of his office during the period between his suspension from his position of purchasing agent for the Atomic Energy Commission and his restoration to duty. Plaintiff says that he was restored to duty because his suspension was found to have been “unjustified or unwarranted” and, hence, since he was in the “classified civil service”, he is entitled to recover under the Lloyd LaFollette Act, 37 Stat. 555, as amended, 5 U.S.C. § 652 (a) and (b) (1958 ed.).

*636Defendant says be was not in the “classified civil service” at the time of his suspension and, hence, has no…