Legal Opinion

Roth v. Brownell, Jr., Attorney General of United States

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided October 25, 1954No. 12126_1PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDGERTON, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff sued to be restored to a position, from which the defendants had removed him, as Trial Attorney GS-14 in the Department of Justice. He appeals from an order of the District Court which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment and dismissed the complaint. Roth v. Brownell, D.C., 117 F.Supp. 362.

Plaintiff was removed from his position, as of the close of business July 31, 1953, by a letter dated June 29, 1953. He had been given no notice that his removal was contemplated. He was given no reasons. He had served in various attorney positions in the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Roth v. BrownellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1953

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Fiorentino v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
  2. Communist Party of the United States of America v. Subversive Activities Control BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
  3. Umbeck v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960
  4. Saltzman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  5. Bodson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API