Legal Opinion

Chase v. Luce

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 22, 1953No. 36,062PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Loking, Chief Justice.

This appeal involves an action by a seven-year-old girl to recover damages for injuries sustained on the premises of defendant and alleged to be the result of the negligence of defendant’s agents, servants, and employees. 2 The jury returned a verdict for plaintiffs, and the trial court denied defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. Judgment was entered for plaintiffs, and defendant appeals from this judgment.

Eesolving all conflicts and doubts in favor of the prevailing parties below, the following appear to be the facts. Defendant was building…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Heitman v. City of Lake CitySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  2. Gimmestad v. Rose Brothers Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  3. Schmit Ex Rel. Schmit v. Village of Cold SpringSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  4. Weber v. Saint Anthony Falls Water Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1942

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Knox v. City of Granite FallsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  2. Smith v. Otto Hendrickson Post 212, American LegionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  3. Davies v. Land O' Lakes Racing Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  4. Schilz v. Walter Kassuba, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Mikkelson v. RisoviNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API