Legal Opinion

Schmit Ex Rel. Schmit v. Village of Cold Spring

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 18, 1944No. 33,567PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Loring, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from an order denying defendant’s motion for judgment or a new trial. The sole question presented for decision is whether there was negligence on the part of defendant.

The action was brought to recover damages for personal injuries to plaintiff, a six-year-old boy, who was burned by an open flare that had been placed as a warning in front of an open trench in one of defendant’s streets. A water main was being laid in a residential street, the work being done as a WPA project. The plans for the project were approved and the work authorized by the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Christianson v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  2. Gimmestad v. Rose Brothers Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  3. Znidersich v. Minnesota Utilities Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  4. McCarthy v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  5. Weber v. Saint Anthony Falls Water Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1942

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Heitman v. City of Lake CitySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  2. Gilligan v. City of ButteMontana Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Knox v. City of Granite FallsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  4. Nolley v. Chicago, M., St. P. & P R. CoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
  5. Smith v. Otto Hendrickson Post 212, American LegionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API