Legal Opinion

In Re the Estate of Jepson

California Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1917No. L. A. Nos. 5055, 5056PublishedCited by 5 opinions

MOTION to dismiss appeals from orders of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County setting aside a homestead and dismissing a contest to the application to set aside such homestead. James C. Rives, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

HENSHAW, J,

Frederick E. Jepson, upon his death, intestate, left surviving him a widow, but neither issue, nor father, nor mother, nor brother, nor sister. He did, however, leave nephews and nieces, children of deceased brothers and sisters. The widow made application to the court in probate to have set apart to her a homestead. These nephews and nieces filed a contest. Their contest was dismissed by the court in probate, upon the ground that they were not parties in interest. The court made its order setting aside a homestead to the widow. The nephews and nieces have appealed from both of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re Estate of IngramCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. In Re Estate of NigroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. In re Estate of CarmodyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. In Re Estate of NigroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  5. In Re Estate of ClaiborneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of RossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Freed v. BerkowitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  3. In Re Estate of JepsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  4. In Re Reil's EstateIdaho Supreme Court · 1949
  5. In Re Estate of JepsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API