Legal Opinion

State v. Pham

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided September 11, 2015No. 20130773-CAPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum Decision

CHRISTIANSEN, Judge:

[ 1 Defendant Anh Tuan Pham appeals his convictions for aggravated robbery, aggravated assault, and riot. Pham argues that the trial court abused its discretion in denying his motion to sever his case from that of a co-defendant. 1 Because Pham failed to preserve his argument below, we affirm.

12 On appeal from a eriminal convietion, we recite the facts from the record in the light most favorable to the jury's verdict. State v. Lee, 2006 UT 5, ¶ 2, 128 P.3d 1179. Pham, Semisi Maama, and Mesia Maama robbed and assaulted a man and his son in the parking lot…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. State v. HolgateUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Patterson v. PattersonUtah Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State v. LeeUtah Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. WeaverUtah Supreme Court · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. Von NiederhausernCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018
  2. State v. AlaridCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2022
  3. State v. LopezCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019
  4. State v. MaamaCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015
  5. State v. KlenzCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API