Legal Opinion

State v. Von Niederhausern

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided August 9, 2018No. 20160581-CAPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORTENSEN, Judge:

¶1 Defendant Lamont Stephen Von Niederhausern allegedly sexually assaulted his adult daughter, Victim, on four separate occasions. The State charged Defendant with two of the four alleged incidents. At trial, the State moved to introduce evidence of the other two incidents under rule 404(b). The trial court allowed the evidence, despite Defendant's objection, and issued a limiting instruction. The trial court also employed-without objection-a jury instruction based on statutorily undefined terms which the court defined for the purpose of the instruction by using dictionaries.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. ClarkUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  4. United States v. Juan Delgado, Emilio Albelo, Juan Carlos Riverol, Tomas Raul HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
  5. State v. ShicklesUtah Supreme Court · 1988

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. StricklanUtah Supreme Court · 2020
  2. State v. GreenUtah Supreme Court · 2023
  3. State v. GallegosCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020
  4. State v. SeachCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2021
  5. State v. HoodCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API