Legal Opinion

McGinty v. Hoosier

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided September 24, 2010No. 101,674PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnson, J.:

The defendants in this quiet title action, Theresa M. Hoosier, et al. (collectively referred to as defendants), appeal the district court’s granting of summary judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, Letha McGinty and Michael McGinty (collectively referred to as the McGiniys). The district court judgment declared that, by virtue of a sheriff s deed in partition dated April 8, 1974, the McGintys acquired ownership of 100% of the surface interest and 50% of the minerals interest in and to the South Half of the Northeast Quarter (S/2 NE/4) of…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Walker v. City of HutchinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Pierce v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  3. State v. WoolvertonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  4. Landmark National Bank v. KeslerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  5. SHAMBERG, JOHNSON & BERGMAN v. OliverSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hansford v. Silver Lake Heights, LLCSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  2. Neighbors Construction Co. v. Woodland Park at Soldier Creek, LLCCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2012
  3. State v. PrattHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. State v. PrattHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API