Legal Opinion

State v. Pratt

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided November 18, 2010No. 27897, 27898, 27899PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

LEONARD, J.

In this case, Defendant-Appellant Lloyd Pratt (Pratt) argues that as a native Hawaiian he has a constitutionally protected right to, inter alia, take up residence in a State wilderness park in Kalalau Valley on the Island of Kaua'i as part of and in order to facilitate his exercise of customary and traditional native Hawaiian practices and to act as a “hoa'aina” or caretaker of the land and restorer of ancient Hawaiian sites. Based on this assertion (and other arguments discussed herein), Pratt contends that this court must reverse three judgments entered on…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Estate of Sanford v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Swift & Co. v. Hocking Valley Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. Ernest J. Saviano and Margaret Saviano v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  5. Pele Defense Fund v. PatyHawaii Supreme Court · 1992

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. PrattHawaii Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State v. PrattHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. State v. PrattHawaii Supreme Court · 2012
  4. State v. PrattHawaii Supreme Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API