Legal Opinion

Chaparro Navarro v. Department of Homeland Security

District Court, N.D. California

Decided April 1, 2020No. 4:17-cv-06404Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ESTHEFANY CHAPARRO NAVARRO, et Case No. 17-cv-06404-DMR al., 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR 9 SUMMARY JUDGMENT v. 10 Re: Dkt. Nos. 69, 73 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF 11 HOMELAND SECURITY, et al., 12 Defendants. 13 Plaintiffs Esthefany Chaparro Navarro (“Chaparro Navarro”) and Manuel Morales 14 Rodriguez (“Morales”) filed this action under the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), 5

15 U.S.C. § 701

et seq., and the Mandamus & Venue Act of 1962 (“MVA”), 28 U.S.C. § 1361, 16 seeking to reverse the United States…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand X Internet ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. Florida v. JardinesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API