Waldock v. Amber Harvest Corp.
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KAPSNER, Justice.
[¶ 1] Joe Waldock appeals from a summary judgment quieting title to 25 percent of the mineral interests under a tract of land in Mountrail County in the successors in interest of the Estate of William C. Edwardson. Waldock argues the district *757court erred in deciding a 1954 administrator’s deed from Edwardson’s Estate to Waldoek’s predecessor in interest, Clark Van Horn, was equivalent to a quitclaim deed and in deciding the rule for interpreting mineral conveyances from Duhig v. Peavy-Moore Co., 135 Tex. 503, 144 S.W.2d 878 (1940), was not applicable to the administrator’s…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Duhig v. Peavy-Moore Lumber Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1940
- Stracka v. PetersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Gawryluk v. PoynterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- North Shore, Inc. v. WakefieldNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- Acoma Oil Corp. v. WilsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wagner v. Crossland Construction Company, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Sargent County Water Resource District v. MathewsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- EOG Resources, Inc. v. Soo Line Railroad Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- Hallin v. LyngstadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- EOG Resources, Inc. v. Soo Line Railroad Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.