Legal Opinion

Waldock v. Amber Harvest Corp.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 2012No. 20120064PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Joe Waldock appeals from a summary judgment quieting title to 25 percent of the mineral interests under a tract of land in Mountrail County in the successors in interest of the Estate of William C. Edwardson. Waldock argues the district *757court erred in deciding a 1954 administrator’s deed from Edwardson’s Estate to Waldoek’s predecessor in interest, Clark Van Horn, was equivalent to a quitclaim deed and in deciding the rule for interpreting mineral conveyances from Duhig v. Peavy-Moore Co., 135 Tex. 503, 144 S.W.2d 878 (1940), was not applicable to the administrator’s…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Duhig v. Peavy-Moore Lumber Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Stracka v. PetersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Gawryluk v. PoynterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  4. North Shore, Inc. v. WakefieldNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Acoma Oil Corp. v. WilsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wagner v. Crossland Construction Company, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Sargent County Water Resource District v. MathewsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  3. EOG Resources, Inc. v. Soo Line Railroad Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Hallin v. LyngstadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  5. EOG Resources, Inc. v. Soo Line Railroad Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API