EOG Resources, Inc. v. Soo Line Railroad Co.
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
McEVERS, Justice.
[¶ 1] Soo Line Railroad Company and G-4, LLC appeal from a summary judgment declaring Soo Line does not own an interest in the minerals in and under certain Mountrail County property and G-4 does not hold a valid leasehold interest in the property. Soo Line and G-4 argue the district court erred in finding seven private deeds conveyed only easements and not a fee simple title to Soo Line’s predecessor-in-interest. We reverse and remand.
I
[¶ 2] EOG Resources, Inc. has an interest in an oil and gas leasehold estate in Mountrail County and operates oil and gas wells. Soo Line is…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Bockelman v. MCI Worldcom, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- Brown v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- Brookbank v. Benedum-Trees Oil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Hamilton v. WollNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Egeland v. Continental Resources, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Sargent County Water Resource District v. MathewsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- Garaas, et al. v. Continental Resources, et al.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2025
- City of West Fargo v. McAllisterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
- EOG Resources, Inc. v. Soo Line Railroad Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- Higgins v. LundNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2025
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.