Legal Opinion

EOG Resources, Inc. v. Soo Line Railroad Co.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 2015No. 20140122PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McEVERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] Soo Line Railroad Company and G-4, LLC appeal from a summary judgment declaring Soo Line does not own an interest in the minerals in and under certain Mountrail County property and G-4 does not hold a valid leasehold interest in the property. Soo Line and G-4 argue the district court erred in finding seven private deeds conveyed only easements and not a fee simple title to Soo Line’s predecessor-in-interest. We reverse and remand.

I

[¶ 2] EOG Resources, Inc. has an interest in an oil and gas leasehold estate in Mountrail County and operates oil and gas wells. Soo Line is…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Bockelman v. MCI Worldcom, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
  2. Brown v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Brookbank v. Benedum-Trees Oil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  4. Hamilton v. WollNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Egeland v. Continental Resources, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2000

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sargent County Water Resource District v. MathewsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Garaas, et al. v. Continental Resources, et al.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2025
  3. City of West Fargo v. McAllisterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  4. EOG Resources, Inc. v. Soo Line Railroad Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Higgins v. LundNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API