Legal Opinion
In Re Warner
United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California
Decided June 21, 1989No. Bankruptcy LAX 88-53708-LFPublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION DENYING CONFIRMATION OF PLAN
LISA HILL FENNING, Bankruptcy Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
In his chapter 13 plan, Debtor Robert Ray Warner proposes to pay his nondis-chargeable child support obligations in full, but pay his other, non-priority unsecured creditors nothing. The chapter 13 trustee objects to confirmation of the plan on the grounds that such discriminatory treatment violates the fundamental fairness principles of chapter 13. For the reasons set forth below, the trustee’s objection is upheld and confirmation of Debtor’s plan is denied.
II. FINDINGS OF FACT
The following facts are…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- In Re BurrusSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Mansell v. MansellSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- In Re Julian Roosevelt Goeb and Jane Alma Goeb, Debtors. In Re Julian Roosevelt Goeb and Jane Alma Goeb v. Harry W. Heid, Chapter 13 TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- In the Matter of John Joseph METZ, Debtor. DOWNEY SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, Appellant, v. John Joseph METZ, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- In Re Victory Const. Co., Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 1981
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- In Re HuertaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 1992
- Spokane Railway Credit Union v. Gonzales (In Re Gonzales)District Court, E.D. Washington · 1994
- In Re BrownUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
- Mickelson v. Leser (In re Leser)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- In Re PackhamUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 1991
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.